"What is overdue?" "Where is proof missing?" Paco answers from your register. And when it does not know, it says so instead of making something up.
The interesting question about a compliance assistant is not what it can say, it is what it refuses to say. Paco works from your property's register, and a question whose answer is not there gets "I do not have that" rather than a plausible sentence.
Paco reads. It does not create an obligation, confirm an interval or close a finding. Those acts commit your compliance, so they stay human decisions, taken from the review queue.
That is not what it is for. Intervals come from the regulatory catalogue, sourced and cited. A model reciting an article from memory eventually produces a reference that does not exist.
No. It is used to answer your question and nothing else. The processors involved are listed in the privacy policy.
The useful test is the one it ought to refuse.
Book a demo