Skip to content

A tool that shows its working

You know the subject better than the software does. Paco cites its source, flags its doubts and refuses to invent. You keep the call.

Every value is checkable at source

An extracted date has to appear literally in the report's text. A suggested interval carries its regulatory reference. You can audit the tool rather than trust it.

  • A value absent from the source text is rejected
  • Intervals cite the article behind them
  • A conflict between contract and law is raised, not silently settled
Interval conflictGas · category 4
Contractor agreement24 monthsRefused
Regulatory text12 monthsKept
The law is a floor: a contract cannot lengthen a statutory interval.
Example data

The disclaimer is part of the product

Every surface showing a regulatory suggestion carries the matching notice, and it is never rewritten by a model. The service is an organisational tool, not legal advice, and it says so where the question arises.

LiteralHow an extracted value is checked
CitedReference on every interval
BlockedObligation with no derivable deadline

Common questions

Can I correct a suggested interval?

Yes, and it is expected. Suggestions are a data-entry aid. An interval you confirm takes precedence over the automatic proposal.

How do I see what the AI read?

The source document stays attached to the obligation, and extracted values are shown with the passage they came from.

Put the tool under test

Bring an ambiguous report. What it refuses to conclude is the real test.

Book a demo
Keep exploring